![]() |
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Institut für
|
| Anschrift:
Institut für Angewandte Mathematik Im Neuenheimer Feld 205 D-69120 Heidelberg |
Tel. + 49 (0) 62 21 - 54 14100 (Sekretariat) email: gerhardt@math.uni-heidelberg.de |
| Area of Research: | Partial Differential Equations, Differential Geometry and General Relativity |
A unified quantum theory incorporating the four fundamental forces of nature is one of the major open problems in physics. The Standard Model combines electro-magnetism, the strong force and the weak force, but ignores gravity. The quantization of gravity is therefore a necessary first step to achieve a unified quantum theory.
The Einstein equations are the Euler-Lagrange equations of the Einstein-Hilbert
functional and quantization of a Lagrangian theory requires to switch from a
Lagrangian view to a Hamiltonian view. In a ground breaking paper, Arnowitt,
Deser and Misner [1] expressed the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian in a form which
allowed to derive a corresponding Hamilton function by applying the
Legendre transformation. However, since the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian is
singular, the Hamiltonian description of gravity is only correct if two
additional constraints are satisfied, namely, the Hamilton constraint, which is
expressed by the equation
, where
is the Hamilton function,
and the diffeomorphism constraint. Dirac [3] proved how to quantize a
constrained Hamiltonian system—at least in principle—and his method
has been applied to the Hamiltonian setting of gravity, cf. the paper of
DeWitt [2] and the monographs by Kiefer [15] and Thiemann [16]. In the
general case, when arbitrary globally hyperbolic spacetime metrics are
allowed, the problem turned out to be extremely difficult and solutions
could only be found by assuming a high degree of symmetry, cf., e.g.,
[4].
However, in [6, 7, 5] we proposed a model for the quantization of gravity for
general hyperbolic spacetimes, in which we eliminated the diffeomorphism
constraint by reducing the number of variables and proving that the
Euler-Lagrange equations for this special class of metrics were still the full
Einstein equations. The Hamiltonian description of the Einstein-Hilbert functional
then allowed a canonical quantization. We quantized the action by looking at the
Wheeler-DeWitt equation in a fiber bundle
, where the base space is a Cauchy
hypersurface of the spacetime which has been quantized and the elements of the
fibers are Riemannian metrics. The fibers of
are equipped with a
Lorentzian metric such that they are globally hyperbolic and the transformed
Hamiltonian, which is now a hyperbolic operator,
, is a normally hyperbolic
operator acting only in the fibers. The Wheeler-DeWitt equation has the
form
with
and we defined with the help of the
Green’s operator a symplectic vector space and a corresponding Weyl
system.
The Wheeler-DeWitt equation seems to be the obvious quantization of the
Hamilton condition. However,
acts only in the fibers and not in the base
space which is due to the fact that the derivatives are only ordinary covariant
derivatives and not functional derivatives, though they are supposed to be
functional derivatives, but this property is not really invoked when a functional
derivative is applied to
, since the result is the same as applying a partial
derivative.
Therefore, we discarded the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in [12], see also [13,
Chapter 1], and expressed the Hamilton condition differently by looking at the
evolution equation of the mean curvature of the foliation hypersurfaces
and implementing the Hamilton condition on the right-hand side of this
evolution equation. The left-hand side, a time derivative, we replaced with the
help of the Poisson brackets. After canonical quantization the Poisson
brackets became a commutator and now we could employ the fact that the
derivatives are functional derivatives, since we had to differentiate the
scalar curvature of a metric. As a result we obtained an elliptic differential
operator in the base space, the main part of which was the Laplacian of the
metric.
On the right-hand side of the evolution equation the interesting term was
![]() |
the square of the mean curvature. It transformed to a second time derivative, the only remaining derivative with respect to a fiber variable, since the differentiations with respect to the other variables canceled each other. The resulting quantized equation is then a wave equation in a globally hyperbolic spacetime
![]() |
where
is the Cauchy hypersurface. When
is a space of constant curvature
then the wave equation, considered only for functions
which do not depend
on
, is identical to the equation obtained by quantizing the Hamilton
constraint in a Friedman universe without matter but including a cosmological
constant.
There also exist temporal and spatial self-adjoint operators
resp.
such
that the hyperbolic equation is equivalent to
![]() |
where
, and
has a pure point spectrum with eigenvalues
while, for
, it is possible to find corresponding eigendistributions for each of
the eigenvalues
, if
is asymptotically Euclidean or if the quantized
spacetime is a Friedmann universe or a black hole with a negative cosmological
constant, cf. [9, 14, 8, 11], see also [13, Chapters 3–6]. The hyperbolic
equation then has a sequence of smooth solutions which are products
of temporal eigenfunctions and spatial eigendistributions. Due to this
„spectral resolution“ of the wave equation we were also able to apply
quantum statistics to the quantized systems, cf. [10], see also [13, Chapter
6].
Recently, we applied these quantum gravitational results to spatially unbounded Friedmann universes in order to answer some questions related to dark energy, dark matter, inflation and the missing antimatter. cf. [14].
An overview of the results can be found here pdf file.
For details of the monograph The Quantization of Gravity [13] published by Springer International click here and for a review of the book by Paulo Moniz for the Mathematical Reviews here.
[1] R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity, Gravitation: an introduction to current research (Louis Witten, ed.), John Wiley, New York, 1962, pp. 227–265.
[2] Bryce S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev. 160 (1967), 1113–1148, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113.
[3] Paul A. M. Dirac, Lectures on quantum mechanics, Belfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series, vol. 2, Belfer Graduate School of Science, New York, 1967, Second printing of the 1964 original.
[4] Claus Gerhardt, Quantum cosmological Friedman models with an initial singularity, Class. Quantum Grav. 26 (2009), no. 1, 015001, arXiv:0806.1769, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/1/015001.
[5] _________ , A unified quantum theory II: gravity interacting with Yang-Mills and spinor fields, 2013, arXiv:1301.6101.
[6] _________ , The quantization of gravity in globally hyperbolic spacetimes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013), no. 6, 1357–1391, arXiv:1205.1427, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2013.v17.n6.a5.
[7] _________ , A unified quantum theory I: gravity interacting with a Yang-Mills field, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014), no. 5, 1043–1062, arXiv:1207.0491, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2014.v18.n5.a2.
[8] _________ , The quantization of a black hole, (2016), arXiv:1608.08209.
[9] _________ , The quantum development of an asymptotically Euclidean Cauchy hypersurface, (2016), arXiv:1612.03469.
[10] _________ , Trace class estimates and applications, (2017), pdf file.
[11] _________ , The quantization of a Kerr-AdS black hole, Advances in Mathematical Physics vol. 2018 (2018), Article ID 4328312, 10 pages, arXiv:1708.04611, doi:10.1155/2018/4328312.
[12] _________ , The quantization of gravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018), no. 3, 709–757, arXiv:1501.01205, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n3.a4.
[13] _________ , The Quantization of Gravity, 1st ed., Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 194, Springer, Cham, 2018, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77371-1.
[14] _________ , Applications of canonical quantum gravity to cosmology, Symmetrie 11 (2019), no. 8, 1005, arXiv:1908.02145, doi:10.3390/sym11081005.
[15] Claus Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 2nd ed., International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, 2007.
[16] Thomas Thiemann, Modern canonical quantum general relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, With a foreword by Chris Isham.
Home page, Flashmode, TEXHelpers, TEX Switcher, pdfselect, rsync,BibTeXtoWord,TEX Scripts, Books, Preprints, Former Students, Veranstaltungen, Lecture Notes